THE COALITION
  • Home
  • Past Shows
    • LIVE Broadcast
    • Gina Raimondo Political Hall O' Shame Inductee William Murray Cumberland Mayor 6/9/17
    • Alicia Ann Kelley - Environmental Activist
    • Rob Cote - Activist Extraordinaire
    • Bobby "The Rep" Nardolillo Candidate-US Senate
    • Arvin Vohra LP National Vice Chair 05/19/17
    • Emerge America Political Director A'shanti Gholar
    • Shannah Kurland \\ PrYSM: Community Safety Act
    • The Debate! Jared Moffat Regulate RI vs. MIchael Cerullo RI Center For Freedom & Prosperity
    • FIT: Meg Kerr\\RIPTA Riders-Pawtucket Soup Kitchen
    • Frank Carini -EcoRI.org
    • Attny's McElroy & Elmer: Invenergy!
    • Lynnette Labinger - ACLU / Donna Personeus Thayer St!
    • Jared Moffat Regulate RI
    • Jon Keith - Rhode Island Senate District 27
    • Homeless Bill of Rights Committee September 17, 2016
    • Republicans For Johnson\\\\Weld August 28, 2016
    • Rep Sherry Roberts: Quiet Strength\\Monique Chartier-Freedom & Prosperity\\Daryl Gould LP Candidate GA @ The Superman
    • Analee Berretto: Libertarian Candidate General Assembly Bristol / Portsmouth
    • Charles Wilson - National Association of Black Law Enforcement Officers
    • Linda Lotridge Levin- Rhode Island Press Association
    • Pride Week! Thom Simmons LP Candidate US Congress / Mike Shipley Outright Libertarians
    • New England Livery: Uber & The Sharing Economy / Del BigTree Vaxxed The Movie
    • Alex Merced Libertarian For US Senate New York-Joanne Leppanen RIPAC Cannabis Tax Crisis
    • Steve Kerbel / Gary Johnson Libertarian Candidate
    • Phil West\\Bill Felkner CLEANRI.org The Ethics Bill 5/14/16
    • Darryl Perry: Libertarian Candidate for the Presidency of the United States
    • CoHost Blake Filippi \\Gary Sasse Represents John Kasich \\Joe Trillo Represents Donald Trump
    • John McAfee: Libertarian Warrior / Candidate for The Presidency of the United States
    • Austin Petersen: Libertarian Candidate for POTUS \\\\ Jame Kennedy TransportPVD
    • Prof Steven Forleo Rocks Corporate Academia
    • Blake Filippi Libertarian Lion
    • CLEAN RI Bill Felkner
    • Moira Walsh Candidate District 3/RIPTA Riders/Fung Fiasco!
    • State of Homelessness-Rhode Island
    • Emergency Medical Cannabis Summit!
    • Bob Lafleur: Rhode Island Independent Contractors
    • Bella Robinson-Coyote / Norma Jean Almodovar Sex Worker Rights Activist
    • StopTollsRI.com / Rep Pat Morgan
    • Michael G Riley Explains It All To You-Pension Crisis Redux
    • J. Kennedy/J. Harris The 6/10 Connector: Boulevard of Dreams?
    • Bella Robinson\\Maxine Doogan Decriminalize!
    • Dr. Beshara Doumani - Syria! 12/5/15
    • The Curious Case O' The Dancing Cop Moore v. Stewart: Presiding Judge Ford
    • RIPTA Riders Alliance/James Kennedy
    • Joan Chabot Candidate Senate District 11/Hillary Davis: RI ACLU
    • Jim Vickers-Manchester 65\\ Greenwich Cove Meadery October 24, 2015
    • Jim Vincent Providence NAACP October 10, 2015
    • Providence Apartment Association\\\\Monique Chartier December 3, 2015
    • John Miner Russ Moore Alex Merced August 26, 2015
    • Shannah Kurland September 19, 2015
    • Kate Nagle Michael Riley September 12, 2015
    • Providence Bankruptcy! 9/21/14 Riley/Harrop/Flanders The Experts Weigh In!
    • Bob Healey: The Cool Moose 10/12/14
    • The Coalition Episode 5
    • Podcast
    • The Coalition Condensed
  • Advertise
  • Civil Liberty News!
    • PO Taxpayer
    • Tony Jones
    • David Fisher
    • The Goldwater Institute
  • Fight the Stadium
  • YOU! Need To Join The ACLU
  • About Us
    • Hosts
    • In The News
    • Contact Us
    • Media Partners
    • Sponsors
  • LIVE Broadcast
  • Our Next Show
  • Coalition YouTube Page
  • The Coalition Podcast!

ACLU OBTAINS COURT RULING AGAINST SMITHFIELD ANTI-MEDICAL MARIJUANA ORDINANCE

9/27/2017

Comments

 
Picture
 In an important victory for the rights of medical marijuana patients in the state, R.I. Superior Court Judge Richard Licht today issued a preliminary injunction against a Smithfield ordinance that the ACLU argued was an attempt to undermine the state’s medical marijuana law by imposing significant burdens on patients’ access to treatment in conflict with state law. The decision establishes an important precedent because a number of other municipalities have adopted, or are considering adopting, similar troubling restrictions on the rights of medical marijuana patients, although Smithfield’s appeared to be the most egregious.
 
In its decision granting the injunction, the Court said that the plaintiffs had demonstrated that enforcement of the ordinance would cause “irreparable harm” by leading to the “unwarranted disclosure of Plaintiffs’ status as medical marijuana cardholders” contrary to state law, that Town interference in the state’s detailed medical marijuana system “could impair the public interest,” and that the hardships to the plaintiffs in terms of their “increased difficulty or inability to either grow or obtain their medicine” weighed in favor of issuing an injunction.
 
The Town’s ordinance, enacted in April, imposes a number of onerous constraints on the possession and growth of medical marijuana, despite, and directly contrary to, stringent regulations already in place under Rhode Island’s medical marijuana law. Among other restrictions, the ordinance limits the growing of medical marijuana to two mature plants and two seedlings, and only at a patient’s primary residence, even though state law specifically allows for the cultivation of 12 mature plants and outlines where medical marijuana can be grown.
 
The Smithfield ordinance further undermines the rights of patients by completely barring caregivers from growing medical marijuana for them anywhere in the town. The ordinance also requires patients to disclose their identity to a number of municipal authorities, which, the suit argues, is almost certain to undermine their right to confidentiality under the law. 
 
The lawsuit, filed by ACLU of RI volunteer attorneys C. Alexander Chiulli, John Meara and Matthew Plain, is on behalf of two licensed medical marijuana patients – listed as Jane Does to protect their confidentiality – and the Rhode Island Patient Advocacy Coalition (RIPAC), a medical marijuana public education organization. Among other things, the suit argues that the ordinance infringes on patients’ rights as guaranteed by state law, unduly restricts access to treatment, harms patients’ privacy rights, and unjustly targets medical marijuana users – all in violation of Rhode Island state law. The suit sought an injunction barring Smithfield’s enforcement of the ordinance. The ACLU had previously urged the Town Council not to adopt the ordinance because of its adverse impact on local residents suffering from serious illnesses.


RIPAC director JoAnne Leppanen said today: “The Smithfield ordinance was based on misinformation and prejudice. It was enacted by a council more concerned with an anti-marijuana agenda than the health of its most fragile and vulnerable residents, the facts, or the law.  It has inflicted stress, fear and suffering on law abiding patients struggling to cope with debilitating medical conditions. We are grateful that the town will now be required to abide by the state law.”  
 
ACLU of RI volunteer attorney C. Alexander Chiulli added: “This decision confirms the legitimacy of Rhode Island’s medical marijuana program and, most importantly, the rights and protections it affords its participants.  It sends a strong message that municipalities statewide must respect those rights.”
 
ACLU of RI executive director Steven Brown stated: “The ACLU is hopeful that this decision will encourage every other municipality considering adopting anti-medical marijuana ordinances to reconsider their plans.” Brown added that, in order to drive the message of the court’s decision home, the ACLU was considering filing suit against one of the other municipalities that presently has a similarly restrictive ordinance in conflict with the state’s medical marijuana law.
 
The court will hold further proceedings at some point in the future on the ACLU’s request to make the preliminary injunction permanent. In the meantime, the ACLU’s Brown said the organization would ask other municipalities to put any similar ordinances or planned ordinances on hold in light of today’s ruling.
 
The full text of the decision can be found here: http://www.riaclu.org/documents/RIPACv.SmithfieldC.A.No.PC17-2989.pdf
​

Comments

“TIME FOR ACTION, NOT WORDS,” SAY 17 IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS TO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ABOUT HELPING DACA STUDENTS

9/8/2017

Comments

 
Picture
Responding to President Trump’s decimation of the DACA program – the Obama program that provided legal status to young children brought to the country unlawfully by their parents – a diverse array of seventeen organizations that work with, or advocate for the rights of, immigrants in Rhode Island have sent letters to all state legislators and municipal leaders calling on them to help DACA recipients with the tools at their disposal.

The organizations said in separate letters to state legislators and

municipal leaders that they were “heartened by the many strong condemnations of the President’s actions” from state and local leaders, but that “the time has now come for action, not just words” to protect those victimized by Trump’s “inhumane action.”

The letter to legislators noted that they had the opportunity to pass three bills pending in the General Assembly – and could do so as early as their upcoming special session this month – to provide protection
to DACA students while the program remains in limbo:

          *  H-6021, which would generally bar schools and other
“sensitive locations” from allowing ICE agents access to their
facilities without a warrant, passage of which would give DACA students
“at least some limited protection from the roundups that have been
happening elsewhere.”

           * H–5237, which would treat DACA recipients as Rhode
Island residents for purposes of qualifying for in-state tuition at the
state’s public colleges and universities, allowing them to continue
their education even as their legal status remains in limbo. The letter
noted: “We can’t condemn President Trump for refusing to treat DACA
recipients as Americans if we refuse to treat them as Rhode
Islanders.”

     * Passage of narrower versions of two bills, S-183 and
H-5686, that would provide special driver’s licenses to undocumented
immigrants. The groups urged that the bills be amended to specifically
authorize licenses for DACA recipients, who currently qualify for
driver’s licenses but will no longer be able to do so once their
status expires under Trump’s DACA repeal.
(more)
         A separate letter to municipal leaders called on them to
pass “comprehensive ordinances that would limit your cooperation and
collaboration with immigration officials.” Earlier this year, the ACLU
of Rhode Island shared with all municipalities a model ordinance that
would do just that.

The two letters concluded by stating:

The Trump Administration’s actions have only exacerbated the
day-to-day fear and dread that already exists among the immigrant
community. Therefore, if you are as appalled as we are at the federal
Administration’s cruel actions against these innocent DACA recipients,
we ask you to demonstrate your concern by taking . . . concrete steps .
 . . to protect them from the mean-spirited and heavy hand of the federal
government.

The groups signing the letters were the ACLU of Rhode Island, Dorcas
International Institute of RI, Alliance of Rhode Island Southeast Asians
for Education, Cambodian Society of Rhode Island, Blackstone Valley
Economic Progress Institute, Fuerza Laboral, Latino Policy Institute,
NAACP – Providence Branch, Providence Student Union, Providence Youth
Student Movement, Refugee Dream Center, Rhode Island Coalition Against
Domestic Violence, Rhode Island State Council of Churches, and Sojourner
House.

The state’s Congressional delegation unanimously supports passage of
legislation to codify the DACA program into law, but fate of such a
proposal remains unclear.

Copies of the letters can be found here:
riaclu.org/images/uploads/Letter_to_Municipal_Leaders_re_DACA_red.pdf

Comments

RIPDA On Pawsox Bill: The Sneakiest Thing Is What We Don't Know Yet .....

9/7/2017

Comments

 
Picture
​Many have commented on S 0989, the legislative proposal to allocate state funds (sans voter approval) to the PawSox’s private corporate venture on the Apex site. What hasn't received adequate public scrutiny is the companion bill S 0990, despite it being significantly more troubling in its implications than S 0989. RI Progressive Dems oppose S 0989 because it violates the RI state constitution which explicitly forbids state issued bonds without voter approval.

Relating to Pawtucket, S 0990 allows the city to designate its most valuable real estate as “redevelopment area” and finances (with taxpayer money) the speculative acquisition of the Apex for new construction. But the immediate purpose of S 0990 is to deregulate all taxpayer-backed redevelopment. First, it strikes existing language which limits redevelopment to “blighted and substandard” areas. Second, it strikes existing language that explicitly prohibits redevelopment funds from financing new construction. Lastly, it grants "redevelopment agencies" the power to hand over their resources to private parties, including gifting large sums of money to private individuals to buy land.

The rewrite opens the door for private, well connected interests to seize private property (at taxpayer expense) through eminent domain wherever they like, and not merely in blighted and substandard areas. The bill discourages privately financed development and dumps the investment risk on the taxpayer, yet safeguards private profits.

What would stop communities like Newport and Bristol from designating their entire municipalities a “redevelopment area,” in which all construction and even land purchases are financed (but not voted on) by the taxpayers?

It is true that Rhode Island largely benefits from redevelopment with respect to rehabilitation and revitalization of existing buildings. Redevelopment funds are supposed to be used for redeveloping blighted neighborhoods, not subsidizing new construction on valuable real estate. It is hard to imagine how the PawSox owners and sponsoring legislators have the audacity to propose these bills at a time when public schools across the state are literally crumbling. We call on all our state senators to oppose both bills. As a state, we cannot allow our needed redevelopment resources to be reduced to yet another slush fund.
​

Comments

    RSS Feed

    Ebates Coupons and Cash Back

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013

Picture
Picture
Picture

Picture